Accudynetest logo

Products available online direct from the manufacturer

ACCU DYNE TEST ™ Bibliography

Provided as an information service by Diversified Enterprises.

3040 results returned
showing result page 48 of 76, ordered by
 

2878. Sabreen, S.R., “Single-pass UV LED inkjet printing on 3D plastics - ink chemistry and polymer surfaces,” Plastics Decorating, 44-46, (April 2021).

2879. Chen, R., and R. Blaik, “Plasma treatment transforms plastic parts into high-value products,” Plastics Decorating, 50-52, (Jul 2021).

2908. Frickley, J., “Solid, liquid, gas and plasma energy: 3DT's improved PlasmaDyne Pro,” Plastics Decorating, 18, (Apr 2022).

2909. Sabreen, S.R., “UV/ozone surface pretreatment to improve adhesion of polymers,” Plastics Decorating, 40-44, (Apr 2022).

2928. Roberts, R., “Surface energy measurements for development and control of surface treatment options,” Plastics Decorating, 32-37, (Oct 2022).

2931. Sabreen, S.R., “Advanced technologies for decorating polyethylene,” Plastics Decorating, 30-33, (Jan 2022).

2948. Couch, M., W. Lee, and M. Plantier, “Best practices for integrating plasma and flame surface treaters,” Plastics Decorating, 28-30, (Apr 2023).

185. Kaplan, S.L., and P.W. Rose, “Plasma treatment upgrades adhesion in plastic parts,” Plastics Engineering, 44, 77-79, (May 1988).

496. Kadash, M.M., and C.G. Seefried Jr., “Closer characterization of corona treated PE surfaces,” Plastics Engineering, 41, 45-48, (Dec 1985).

611. no author cited, “Corona treatment improves ink adhesion,” Plastics Engineering, 43, 13, (Jul 1987).

924. Pocius, A.V., D.J. Kinning, D.J. Yarusso, B. Thakkar, V.S. Mangipudi, M. Tirrell, “Adhesion at polymer interfaces and pressure sensitive adhesive tapes,” Plastics Engineering, 53, 31-36, (Dec 1997).

930. Mikulec, M., “Olefinic color coats eliminate TPO pretreatment,” Plastics Engineering, 53, 41-42, (Sep 1997).

1609. Tolinski, M., “Energetic surface treatments: advanced methods increase surface energy and properties,” Plastics Engineering, 63, 46-47, (Oct 2007).

2233. Sabreen, S.R., “Solving the problem of plastics adhesion,” Plastics Engineering, 67, 6-8, (Apr 2011).

2342. Von der Heide, J.C., “Guide to corona film treatment,” Plastics Engineering, 17, 199-205, (May 1961).

2672. Couchie, M., “Tips for selecting coating chemistries for hard-to-coat plastics,” Plastics Engineering, 72, 40-43, (Nov 2016).

48. Callari, J., “Treat film only where needed, or you're throwing away $$,” Plastics Technology, 44, 53, (Apr 1998).

180. Kaainoa, S., “What you should know about bare-roll corona treaters,” Plastics Technology, 32, 85-88, (Feb 1986).

410. no author cited, “Ceramic rollers boost corona-treating uptime,” Plastics Technology, 42, 92, (Feb 1996).

905. no author cited, “New approach to plastic surface treatment,” Plastics Technology, 49, 37, (Sep 2003).

1348. Schut, J.H., “Plasma treatment: The better bond,” Plastics Technology, 38, 64-69, (Oct 1992).

1502. Grande, J.A., “Now plasma-treat the resin, not the molded part,” Plastics Technology, 52, 32-33, (Dec 2006).

1555. no author cited, “Atmospheric plasma treats thick sheet,” Plastics Technology, 53, 15, (May 2007).

2156. no author cited, “New web treatment process combines corona and coating,” Plastics Technology, 55, 21, (Jun 2009).

333. Sheng, E., R.J. Heath, I. Sutherland, and D.M. Brewis, “Surface modification of propylene by flame treatment - a study,” Plastics and Rubber International, 16, 10-12, (Aug 1991).

615. no author cited, “Non-flaming: a good way to treat apolar surfaces,” Plastics and Rubber International, 1421, 6, (Feb 1992).

233. Mascia, L., G.E. Carr, and P. Kember, “Plasma treatment of PTFE: effects of processing parameters on bonding properties,” Plastics and Rubber Processing and Applications, 9, 133-140, (1988).

1. Bassemir, R.W., and R. Krishnan, “Surface phenomena in waterbased flexo inks for printing on polyethylene films,” in Surface Phenomena and Fine Particles in Water-Based Coatings and Printing Technology, Sharma, M.K., and F.J. Micale, eds., 27-34, Plenum Press, 1991.

In the Flexographic printing of polyethylene films with waterbased flexo inks, the partitioning of the surfactants between film/ink, pigment/ water, ink/air interfaces plays a major role in determining the printability. In addition, in formulations containing nonionic surfactants the equilibrium surface properties are much different from the diffusion limited dynamic properties. Problems associated with the printability are examined from an analysis of the above surface chemical considerations.

14. Bascom, W.D., “The wetting behavior of fibers,” in Modern Approaches to Wettability: Theory and Applications, Schrader, M.E., and G.I. Loeb, eds., 359-373, Plenum Press, 1992.

Historically, the technologies most interested in the wetting of fibers have been those involved in the processing of textiles.(1, 2) Much of the early scientific literature on wetting was concerned with liquid penetration into fabrics and other porous solids.(3) More recently, the rapid development of fiber reinforced composites, notably carbon fiber and glass fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP, GFRP), has generated a renewed interest in the wetting of fibers. However, in the interim there has been a change in the scientific attitude toward the use of contact angle measurements as a means of characterizing the surface chemical constitution of solids. In the early literature, the contact angle was viewed as a characteristic of the fiber and a parameter in the capillarity equations for liquid penetration. Due in large measure to the studies by W. A Zisman and co-workers, there has been a change in attitude toward the physical significance of contact angle measurements. It is now recognized that the contact angle can be a highly sensitive tool for surface characterization. Consequently, there is a growing body of literature on the wetting of textile fibers and fibers used in composites aimed at surface chemical characterization as well as the processing of these fibers into composite materials.

63. Clearfield, H.M., D.K. McNamara, and G.D. Davis, “Adherend surface preparation for structural adhesive bonding,” in Fundamentals of Adhesion, Lee, L.-H., ed., 203-238, Plenum Press, Feb 1991.

This chapter summarizes our present understanding of surface preparations for structural adhesive bonding of aluminum, titanium, and steel adherends. Both the initial bond strength and the subsequent bond durability depend critically on the interaction of the adhesive (and/or primer) with a pretreated adherend. There are two mechanisms of adhesion that are prominent in structural adhesive bonding: mechanical interlocking of the polymer adhesive with a microscopically rough adherend surface, and chemical bonding (with either covalent bonds or weaker van der Waals bonds) of adhesive molecules to the (intentional) adherend oxide. The magnitude and relative importance of both of these interactions depend greatly on the nature of the adherend surface prior to bonding and on the rheology and chemistry of the adhesive.

72. Davis, G.D., “Characterization of surfaces,” in Fundamentals of Adhesion, Lee, L.-H., ed., 139-174, Plenum Press, Feb 1991.

75. de Gennes, P.-G., “The dynamics of wetting,” in Fundamentals of Adhesion, Lee, L.-H., ed., 173-179, Plenum Press, Feb 1991.

85. Domingue, J., “A dynamic approach to surface energy and wettability phenomena in flexography,” in Surface Phenomena and Additives in Water-Based Coatings and Printing Technology, Sharma, M.K., ed., 163-170, Plenum Press, Feb 1992.

Dynamic Contact Angle Technique offers a unique, non-optical alternative to solid surface energy analysis. The technique provides advancing and receding hysteresis profile scans of a surface recorded in real time as the liquid meniscus traverses the solid surface. Changes in the wetting hysteresis scan can be used to characterize the qualitative effects of surface roughness, surface homogeneity, and surface polarity, as well as measure the quantitative surface energy of the solid. Applications in flexography in which wettability plays a critical role are numerous, and the switch from solvent-based inks to water-based inks gives impetus for future study.

86. Dryden, P., J.H. Lee, J.M. Park, and J.D. Andrade, “Modeling of the Wilhelmy contact angle method with practical sample geometries,” in Polymer Surface Dynamics, 9-24, Plenum Press, 1988.

96. Filbey, J.A., and J.P. Wightman, “Surface characterization in polymer/metal adhesion,” in Fundamentals of Adhesion, L.-H. Lee, ed., 175-202, Plenum Press, Feb 1991.

Adhesion involves a detailed understanding of polymer synthesis and characterization, mechanics, and surfaces. This chapter reviews surface analysis and interphase analysis emphasizing polymer/metal systems. The interphase is a thin region between the bulk adherend and the bulk adhesive, as depicted in Figure 1. A surface oxide, either native or one produced by pre-treatment, is present on most metal adherends. A primer is often applied in a production process after pretreatment and before the application of an adhesive. Typical thicknesses for the oxide are 0.003–0.4 µm, for the primer 4 µm (0.16 mil), and for the adhesive 40 µm (1.6 mil). The interphase region is expected to have mechanical properties different from either the adherend or the adhesive. Measurement of these properties is important in understanding adhesion, for example, poorly durable bonds are often a consequence of poor interphase properties.(1,2) Thus, one of the frontier areas in adhesion science today is determining interphase properties.

142. Good, R.J., and M.K. Chaudhury, “Theory of adhesive forces across interfaces, I. The Lifshitz-van der Waals component of interaction in adhesion,” in Fundamentals of Adhesion, Lee, L.-H., ed., 137-151, Plenum Press, Feb 1991.

The theory of the apolar components of interfacial forces was examined in the previous chapter of this volume.(1) It has been possible to develop that theory of apolar components at this time owing to the existence of quantitative, mathematically formulated theories of forces between molecules (e.g., the London theory) together with the Lifshitz electromagnetic theory of the interaction of macroscopic bodies. (See the previous chapter for references.)

143. Good, R.J., M.K. Chaudhury, and C.J. van Oss, “Theory of adhesive forces across interfaces, II. Interfacial hydrogen bonds as acid-base phenomena and as factors enhancing adhesion,” in Fundamentals of Adhesion, Lee, L.-H., ed., 153-172, Plenum Press, Feb 1991.

The theory of the apolar components of interfacial forces was examined in the previous chapter of this volume.(1) It has been possible to develop that theory of apolar components at this time owing to the existence of quantitative, mathematically formulated theories of forces between molecules (e.g., the London theory) together with the Lifshitz electromagnetic theory of the interaction of macroscopic bodies. (See the previous chapter for references.)

144. Good, R.J., and C.J. van Oss, “The modern theory of contact angles and the hydrogen bond components of surface energies,” in Modern Approaches to Wettability: Theory and Applications, Schrader, M.E., and G.I. Loebs, eds., 1-27, Plenum Press, Oct 1992.

We owe a great debt to W. A. Zisman and his colleagues at the Naval Research Laboratory for their extensive, pioneering work that opened up the field of contact angles and made possible the development of the modern theory of wetting and adhesion. Their data on the wetting of solids by apolar liquids and by hydrogen bonding liquids pointed the way to the recent introduction of a theory of hydrogen bond interactions across interfaces. We will devote this chapter to a review of this new theory.

192. Kigle-Boeckler, G., “Surface tension measurement (ring method) and characterization of coating materials,” in Surface Phenomena and Additives in Water-Based Coatings and Printing Technology, Sharma, M.H., ed., 269-282, Plenum Press, Feb 1992.

A detail discussion of the theoretical aspects of surface tension measurements by ring method is provided with special emphasis on the sources of error. The accuracy of the measured data is mainly limited by the correction factor “f”, which compensates for the non-symmetrical shape of the surface. Based on the experimental findings, it is suggested to include the correction factor during the evaluation of the surface tension, especially if an accuracy of less than 0.1mN/m is required. The effect of meniscus shape and size on the surface tension is discussed. In addition to the surface tension measurements, several other physical properties of the coating systems such as settling behavior and hardness of the settlement can be measured by using the dynometer from BYK-Gardner as a measuring device. The results on different coating systems are presented to study the settling and hardness of the settled material.

202. Kumar, D., and S.N. Srisastava, “Wettability and surface energies of polymer substrates,” in Surface Phenomena and Fine Particles in Water-Based Coatings and Printing Technology, Sharma, M.S., and F.J. Micale, eds., 299-308, Plenum Press, Jun 1991.

The coating and printing of polymer films with water-based formulations are relatively difficult as compared to solvent-based formulations. The surface tension of water is higher than that of the solvents. In addition, the surface energy of polymer surfaces is in the range of 25–40 ergs/cm2. In order to understand the wetting and spreading behavior of coating materials, the polar and non-polar surface energies were evaluated by measuring contact angle of water and methylene iodide on various non-porous substrates. These results were utilized to explain the spreading, wettability and adhesion phenomena in order to understand the interactions between water-based coating/printing materials and non-porous substrates.

 

<-- Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | Next-->