ACCU DYNE TEST ™ Bibliography
Provided as an information service by Diversified Enterprises.
showing result page 73 of 78, ordered by
2717. Extrand, C.W., “Uncertainty in contact angle estimates from a Wilhelmy tensiometer,” J. Adhesion Science and Technology, 29, 2515-2520, (2015).
The uncertainty in contact angles from the Wilhelmy tensiometer was analyzed using standard error propagation techniques involving partial derivatives across the full range of wettability, from completely wetting to non-wetting surfaces. Uncertainties in force, sample perimeter, and liquid surface tension of 1% were shown to yield uncertainty in contact angles of a few degrees over the middle range of wettability, but exceeded 10° at the extremes.
2872. Law, K.-L, and H. Zhao, Surface Wetting: Characterization, Contact Angle, and Fundamentals, Springer, 2016.
3087. Ovaska, S.S., R. Rinkunas, T. Lozovski, R. Maldzius, J. Sidaravicius, L.-S. Johansson, M. Osterberg, and K. Backfolk, “Occurrence of reverse side effects in corona treatment of dispersion-coated paperboard and its influence on grease barrier properties,” J. Applied Packaging Research, 18, 66-79, (2016).
The uncoated side of dispersion-barrier-coated paperboards was exposed to positive and negative direct current corona treatments in order to confirm the occurrence of backside treatment and clarify its effects on the usability of the paperboard. The main component of the coating dispersions was hydroxypropylated potato starch and the effects of talc and styrene-butadiene latex additions on backside treatment were evaluated. Coatings with a high talc proportion showed excellent initial grease resistance, but corona-induced strikethroughs caused a drastic decrease in grease penetration time. The root-mean-square roughness measurements revealed moderate surface roughening at the backside, indicating thus backside treatment. The alterations in surface free energies and rapeseed oil contact angles confirmed the occurrence of backside treatment. The high polarization potential of latex played a key role in these observations. At the same time, the inertity of talc had a stabilizing effect but it did not prevent backside treatment completely. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy results verified that backside treatment occurs also when the barrier-coated side of the substrate is treated with corona, indicating that a dispersion coating layer does not prevent this undesired phenomenon. Bearing in mind that expressing customized information or including personalized elements in food packages or disposable cups and plates is under great interest, it can be assumed the exposure of packaging materials to corona will become more common in the near future, and the need for optimizing bio-based packaging materials for such purposes is obvious.
3095. Izdebska-Podsiadly, J., and S. Thomas, Printing on Polymers: Fundamentals and Applications, William Andrew/Elsevier, 2016.
2630. Abbott, S., “Adhesion Apps: What is NOT important in adhesion?,” Converting Quarterly, 6, 10, (Jan 2016).
2631. Kaverman, J., “Methods and materials for difficult pad printing operations,” Plastics Decorating, 14-16, (Jan 2016).
2632. Stecher, A., “Ask the expert Q & A: Plasma treating,” Plastics Decorating, 46-51, (Jan 2016).
2624. Bishop, C.A., “A problem of metal transfer,” http://www.convertingquarterly.com/vacuum-web-coating/a-problem-of-metal..., Feb 2016.
2629. Coombes, N., “Corona control: Learning to understand the treatment basics,” Flexo, 41, 26-27, (Feb 2016).
2639. Smith, R.E., “Testing metals for cleanliness,” http://www.accudynetest.com/blog/testing-metals-for-cleanliness/, Feb 2016.
2640. Smith, R.E., “Polarity of corona-treated polymer film,” http://www.accudynetest.com/blog/polarity-of-corona-treated-polymer-film/, Feb 2016.
2628. Krasucki, D., “New technology improvements keep Mayer rods competitive,” http://www.convertingquarterly.com/web-coating/new-technology-improvements-..., Mar 2016.
2638. Smith, R.E., “Why not to use brush applicator caps for bottled dyne solutions,” http://www.accudynetest.com/blog/brush-applicator-caps-for-bottled-dyne-solutions/, Mar 2016.
2643. Smith, R.E., “Using the dyne test to evaluate the cleanliness of metals,” http://accudynetest.com/dyne_test_metal_cleanliness.html, Mar 2016.
2637. Smith, R.E., “Polymer surface energy vs. coefficient of friction (COF),” http://www.accudynetest.com/blog/polymer-surface-energy-vs-coefficient-of-friction-cof/, Apr 2016.
2646. Schoff, C.K., “Application defects,” CoatingsTech, 13, 32-39, (Apr 2016).
2647. Willes, B., “Treating the surface: Options for all surface types,” Plastics Decorating, 14-16, (Apr 2016).
2679. Smith, R.E., “Sample orientation for dyne testing,” http://www.accudynetest.com/blog/sample-orientation-for-dyne-testing/, Apr 2016.
2834. Seitz, V., K. Azrt, S. Mahnel, C. Rapp, S. Schwaminger, M. Hoffstetter, E. Wintermantel, “Improvement of adhesion strength of self-adhesive silicone rubber on thermoplastic substrates - Comparison of atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) and a Pyrosil flame,” Intl. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, 66, 65-72, (Apr 2016).
Polymeric hard/soft combinations consisting of a rigid, thermoplastic substrate and an elastomeric component offer many advantages for plastic parts in industry. Manufactured in one step by multi-component injection moulding, the strength of the thermoplastics can be combined with sealing, damping or haptic properties of an elastomer. Bonds of self-adhesive liquid silicone rubber (LSR) on high performance thermoplastics such as polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or polyphenylene sulphide (PPS) are especially interesting e.g. for medical applications due to their outstanding resistance properties. To ensure good adhesion between the two components, surface treatments from an atmospheric pressure plasma jet (APPJ) and a Pyrosil® flame are applied. Chemical changes on the thermoplastic surfaces are verified by water contact angle measurement (CA) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Plasma treatment causes a decline in water contact angle, indicating the formation of functional groups, especially –OH, on the surface. XPS measurements confirm the increase of oxygen on the surface. Thus, the number of functional groups on the thermoplastic surface is enlarged by plasma treatment, leading to stronger bonding to the organofunctional silanes of the self-adhesive silicone rubber. A thin layer of silanol groups is created by the Pyrosil® flame on the thermoplastic substrates, which could be verified by XPS. A hydrophilic behaviour of the coated surface is noticed. Both surface modification methods lead to enhanced adhesion properties of self-adhesive LSR on thermoplastic surfaces. This is confirmed by 90°- peel tests of the injection-moulded composites leading to an increase in peel force by the applied surface modification techniques.
1650. Ranowsky, A., “CSC Scientific blog: Contact angle and surface tension - a fascinating liaison,” https://www.cscscientific.com/csc-scientific-blog/how-does-contact-angle-relate-to-surface-tension, Apr 2016.
2626. Henry, E.B., “Determination of the surface energy for UV-curable, easy-release coatings,” Presented at RadTech 2016, May 2016.
2627. Mahmood, A.A., “Surface energy: An applied experimental design for novel UV-curable coatings,” Presented at RadTech 2016, May 2016.
2644. Mount, E.M. III, “Adhesion loss in metallized laminations,” http://www.convertingquarterly.com/substrate-secrets/adhesion-loss-in..., May 2016.
2648. Abbott, S., “Adhesion Apps: What IS important in adhesion?,” Converting Quarterly, 6, 12-13, (May 2016).
2649. Mount, E.M. III, “Substrate secrets: How do we test for invisible variations in film surface energy?,” Converting Quarterly, 6, 14-15, (May 2016).
2650. Altay, B.N., “Smart ink for flexo,” Flexo, 41, 70-75, (Jun 2016).
2645. Bishop, C.A., “Plasma treatment - inside knowledge,” http://www.convertingquarterly.com/vacuum-web-coating/plasma-treatement-inside..., Jul 2016.
2651. Mania, D.M., “Is there a correlation between contact angle and stain repellency?,” Coatings World, 21, 99-105, (Jul 2016).
2666. Abbott, S., “Adhesion Apps: Why does a higher level of cross-linking actually make adhesion weaker?,” Converting Quarterly, 6, 16-17, (Aug 2016).
2680. Smith, R.E., “Corona treater output vs. increase in dyne level,” http://blog.accudynetest.com/corona-treater-output-vs-increase-in-dyne-level/, Aug 2016.
2830. Kiel, A., “Corona vs. plasma treatment,” https://www.3dtllc.com/corona-vs-plasma-treatment/, Aug 2016.
3043. Gatenby, A., “CSC Scientific blog: Initiation to contact angle - a classical definition of contact angle,” https://www.cscscientific.com/csc-scientific-blog/initiation-to-contact-angle, Aug 2016.
2652. Gatenby, A., “CSC Scientific blog: Should you move to 'actual' surface tension?,” https://www.cscscientific.com/csc-scientific-blog/should-you-convert-to-actual-surface-tension, Sep 2016.
2681. Smith, R.E., “Discrepant results from one test marker compared to others at the same dyne level,” http://blog.accudynetest.com/discrepant-results-from-one-test-marker-compared-to-others-at-the-same-dyne-level/, Sep 2016.
2682. Smith, R.E., “Using surface tension test fluids to calibrate a tensiometer,” http://blog.accudynetest.com/using-surface-tension-test-fluids-to-calibrate-a-tensiometer/, Sep 2016.
2925. no author cited, “Common surface energy tests: Dyne inks,” Brighton Science, Sep 2016.
2667. Weiss, D.A., “Effective ink transfer,” Flexo, 41, 68-72, (Oct 2016).
3072. Rocca-Smith, J.R., T. Karbowiak, E. Marcuzzo, A. Sensidoni, F. Piasante D. Champion, et al, “Impact of corona treatment on PLA film properties,” Polymer Degradation and Stability, 132, 109-116, (Oct 2016).
Different types of PLA films treated by corona are currently available in the market for coating or printing applications. However, data relative to its impact on PLA film properties are scarce and do not generally consider industrial scale production. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of corona treatment on the surface, structure and barrier properties of bi-oriented PLA films produced at industrial scale. Thus, a comparative study between corona treated (CT) and non-corona treated (NCT) PLA films was conducted. The surface of films was studied using Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and goniometry measurements. The structure of films was analyzed with thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and uniaxial tensile analysis. The barrier properties of films to three gases (He, O2, CO2) were also determined. This study unambiguously revealed that corona treatment led to modifications in both surface and bulk of PLA films. In particular, surface analysis displayed the well-known capability of corona treatment to chemically and physically modify the surface of PLA films at the nanometer scale by increasing polarity and roughness. The structural analysis displayed a slight increase in the crystallinity degree and slight modifications in mechanical properties of films. This probably originated from temperature increase associated to corona treatment, which favored physical changes (e.g. relaxation, crystallization) of a part of the bi-orientated PLA chains, and therefore highlights the importance of such an industrial step on the film properties for packaging applications. As a result of these modifications, the barrier properties of films to three gases (He, O2, CO2) are also slightly improved.
2668. no author cited, “Vetaphone launches corona treatment testing machine,” http://www.labelandnarrowweb.com/contents/view_breaking-news/2016-11-09/..., Nov 2016.
2670. Abbott, S., “Adhesion Apps: Why is 'real' adhesion 'unknowable'?,” Converting Quarterly, 6, 12-13, (Nov 2016).
<-- Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | Next-->