ACCU DYNE TEST ™ Bibliography
Provided as an information service by Diversified Enterprises.
showing result page 69 of 78, ordered by
2456. Utschig, S., “Measuring surface energy on non-porous substrates,” https://www.enerconind.com/web-treating/support/application-support/measuring-surface-energy-on-non-porous-substrates.aspx, 2012.
2575. Friedrich, J.F., The Plasma Chemistry of Polymer Surfaces: Advanced Techniques for Surface Design, Wiley-VCH, 2012.
2602. no author cited, “Problems with dyne pen measurements on polycarbonate,” http://www.sheffieldplastics.com/web_docs/SurfaceEnergy-TechnicalBrief_2012.pdf, 2012.
2707. Dixon, D., and B. Meenan, “Atmospheric dielectric barrier discharge treatments of polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, and poly(ethylene terephthalate) for enhanced adhesion,” J. Adhesion Science and Technology, 26, 2325-2337, (2012).
A critical review of published studies investigating the dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) treatment of four polymers widely employed in the packaging sector, namely: polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and polystyrene (PS) is presented. The DBD treatment process operates at atmospheric pressure in air, and thereby offers a low cost method of enhancing the surface properties of polymers. The method is suitable for high volume in-line applications such as packaging. It has been reported that treatment doses as low as 0.01 J/cm2 result in significant increases in surface energy and wettability, leading to enhanced adhesive bonding and printing performance. Two critical issues limit the improvements obtained via the DBD processing of polymers. Firstly, DBD processing can produce a poorly adhered surface layer of low molecular weight material, which can then interfere with bonding and printing processes. Secondly, the properties of DBD treated polymers tend to revert towards that of the untreated state during storage.
2708. Baptista, D., L. Muszynski, D. Gardner, and E. Atzema, “An experimental method for three-dimensional dynamic contact angle analysis,” J. Adhesion Science and Technology, 26, 2199-2215, (2012).
Droplet dynamics analysis concerns the measurements of droplet volume, cap and base areas and contact angles, as they change in time to study evaporation, wettability, adhesion and other surface phenomena and properties. In a typical procedure, the two-dimensional measurements are based on a series of images recorded at successive stages of the experiment from a single view. Only a few basic dimensions of sessile droplets are commonly measured from such images, while many other quantities of interest are derived utilizing geometrical relationships. The reliability of these calculations is limited by the necessary assumption that the droplet shape can be approximated as a spherical cap. In reality, the sessile droplet shapes are influenced by gravity, liquid surface tension, local surface anisotropy and microstructure, which often produce non-spherical cap shapes.
This paper describes an experimental methodology for determination of key parameters, such as volume and contact angle for dynamic sessile droplets that can be approximated either by spherical or ellipsoidal cap geometries. In this method, images collected simultaneously from three cameras positioned orthogonally to each other are used to record the dynamic behavior of non-spherical droplets. Droplet shape is approximated as an ellipsoid of arbitrary orientation with respect to the cameras, which allows determination of volume and contact angle along the base perimeter. A major advantage of this method is that the dynamic parameters of droplets on anisotropic surfaces can be determined even when the orientation of the axes changes throughout the droplet lifetime. The method is illustrated with experimental results for a spherical and an ellipsoidal droplet.
2709. Jacobs, T., R. Morent, N. De Geyter, T. Desmet, S. Van Vlierberghe, P. Dubruel, and C. Leys, “The effect of medium pressure plasma treatment on thin poly-caprolactone layers,” J. Adhesion Science and Technology, 26, 2239-2249, (2012).
In this work, the effect of medium pressure plasma treatment on thin poly-ϵ-caprolactone (PCL) layers on glass plates is investigated. PCL is a biocompatible and biodegradable polymer which potentially can be used for bone repair, tissue engineering and other biomedical applications. However, cell adhesion and proliferation are inadequate due to its low surface energy and a surface modification is required in most applications. To enhance the surface properties of thin PCL layers spin coated on glass plates, a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) at medium pressure operating in different atmospheres (dry air, argon, helium) was used. After plasma treatment, water contact angle measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were used to examine the PCL samples. These measurements show that the medium pressure plasma treatment is able to increase the hydrophilic character of the samples, due to an incorporation of oxygen groups at the surface and that the surface roughness is significantly decreased after plasma treatment.
2710. Li, Y., J. Sun, L. Yao, F. Ji, S. Peng, Z. Gao, and Y. Qiu, “Influence of moisture on effectiveness of plasma treatments of polymer surfaces,” J. Adhesion Science and Technology, 26, 1123-1139, (2012).
In atmospheric pressure plasma treatments water molecules in the substrate material may disrupt the molecular arrangement in the substrate and thus greatly influence the outcome of the plasma treatment. This paper summarizes the results of our recent studies on how moisture influences the etching, surface chemical modification, crystallinity and aging of aramid, ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), polyamide fibers, and poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) films. Overall, a higher moisture regain often results in a greatly enhanced etch rate, less surface chemical composition change, increased near-surface crystallinity, which could lead to a higher surface wettability, higher interfacial shear strength between the fibers and resin, decreased water solubility for PVA films, and delayed hydrophobic recovery of plasma treated fibers. Therefore, it is important to control the moisture contained in the substrate in atmospheric pressure plasma treatments.
2711. Rudawsk, A., “Surface free energy and 7075 aluminum bonded joint strength following degreasing only and without any prior treatment,” J. Adhesion Science and Technology, 26, 1233-1247, (2012).
Adhesion is a surface phenomenon occurring in many processes, e.g., bonding, painting or varnishing. Knowing the adhesion properties is critical for evaluating the usability or behaviour of materials during these processes. Good adhesion properties favour the processes of bonding, resulting in high strength of adhesive joints. Adhesive bonded joints are used in many industries, and the subject of this study was 7075 aluminium alloy sheet bonded joints as typically used in the aviation or construction industry. Surface free energy (SFE) can be used to determine the adhesion properties of the materials. The SFE of the tested sheets was determined with the Owens–Wendt method, which consists in determining the dispersion and polar components of SFE. The purpose of this work was to correlate the bonded joint strength of selected aluminium alloy sheets to the surface free energy of the sheets that had been subjected to degreasing only and no other prior treatment was used. Single-lap bonded joints of 7075 aluminium alloy sheets were tested. Higher joint strength was measured for the thinner sheets, while the lowest strength was measured for the thickest sheets. This suggests that the thickness of the joined parts is an important factor in the strength of bonded joints. The comparison of adhesion properties to the strength of adhesive joints of tested materials shows that there is no direct relation between good adhesion properties (i.e., high SFE) and joint strength. As for degreasing, the highest joint strength was observed for aluminium alloy sheets with the lowest SFE; the sheets which were not degreased gave the highest SFE and highest joint strength.
2736. Dowling, D.P., J. Tynan, P. Ward, A.M. Hynes, J. Cullen, and G. Byrne, “Atmospheric pressure plasma treatment of amorphous polyethylene terephthalate for enhanced heatsealing properties,” Intl. J. Adhesion & Adhesives, 35, 1-8, (2012).
An atmospheric pressure plasma system has been used to treat amorphous polyethylene terephthalate (APET) to enhance its healseal properties to a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film. The plasma treated APET sheet material was thermoformed into trays for use in the food packaging industry and heatsealed to a PET film. The heatsealing properties of the resulting package were assessed using the burst test technique. It was found that the plasma treatment significantly enhanced the adhesive properties and an increase in burst pressure from 18 to 35 kPa was observed for plasma treated food trays. The APET surface chemistry was assessed after plasma treatment where it was found that the plasma treatment had affected an increase in oxygen and an addition of nitrogen species to the polymer surface. The surface roughness (Ra) of the plasma treated samples was also observed to increase from 0.4 to 0.9 nm after plasma treatment.
2977. Novak, I., A. Popelka, J. Chodak, and J. Sedliacek, “Study of adhesion and surface properties of modified polypropylene,” in Polypropylene, 125-160, InTech, 2012.
3061. Caceres, C.A., N. Mazzola, M. Franca, and S.V. Canevarolo, “Controlling in-line the energy level applied during the corona treatment,” Polymer Testing, 31, 505-511, (2012).
A method to corona treat a polymeric surface with a fixed and pre-set treatment energy level is proposed. In order to reduce the effect of humidity, the Corona Discharge Energy – CDE value was controlled during the corona treatment by an in-line monitoring apparatus, which indicates when the energy level is attained. The method was tested applying a negative corona treatment discharge on a polypropylene copolymer film. Chemical and morphological surface changes were examined by IR spectra, contact angle and morphology. Treated samples show the presence of carbonyl, hydroxyl and unsaturations, the first being less concentrated. The formation of polar groups on the film surface led to a reduction of the contact angle and an increase in the surface tension. Film surface morphology was also modified, showing a second phase granular structure which grows with the increase of the CDE level.
2430. Mount, E.M. III, “Substrate secrets: Surface treatment and heat sealing OPP,” http://www.convertingquarterly.com/blogs/substrate-secrets/id/3081/, Jan 2012.
2985. Vesel, A., and M. Mozetic, “Surface modification and ageing of PMMA polymer by oxygen plasma treatment,” Vacuum, 86, 634-637, (Jan 2012).
We present a study on ageing of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) polymer treated with oxygen plasma. Oxygen plasma was created with an RF generator operating at a frequency of 27.12 MHz and a power of 200 W. The oxygen pressure was 75 Pa. The samples were treated for different time from 5 s to 60 s. The chemical modifications of the surface after plasma treatment were monitored by XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy), while the wettability and ageing effects were studied by WCA (water contact angle measurements). The samples were aged in dry air or in water. In the case of dry air, the least pronounced ageing was observed for the sample treated for 60 s. For samples aged in water, however, the lowest ageing rate was observed for the sample treated for 5 s. The samples were ageing slightly faster in water than in air. We also investigated the temperature effect on ageing of plasma treated samples. A set of samples was stored in a refrigerator at 5 °C and the other set was placed into an oven at 50 °C. The ageing rate of the samples stored at 5 °C was significantly lower than for the samples stored at 50 °C, so cooling the samples help keeping the required surface properties.An atmospheric pressure plasma syste
2432. Mount, E.M. III, “Substrate secrets: We are seeing differences in tape testing and lamination adhesion behavior,” http://www.convertingquarterly.com/blogs/substrate-secrets/id/3877/, Feb 2012.
2434. Wolf, R.A., “Game-changing surface pre-treatment technology,” Converting Quarterly, 2, 46-50, (Feb 2012).
2435. Sabreen, S.R., “Plastics surface energy wetting test methods,” http://www.plasticsdecorating.com/ENEWS/ENews.asp?/item=surfaceenergywetting, Mar 2012.
2446. Wolf, R.A., “The Rx factor - medical plastics and adhesion,” http://plasticsdecoratingblog.com/?p=277, Mar 2012.
3081. Gatenby, A., “CSC Scientific blog: Is calibrating a CSC tensiometer hard?,” https://www.cscscientific.com/csc-scientific-blog/bid/76518/is-calibrating-a-csc-tensiometer-hard?, Mar 2012.
840. Zenkiewicz, M., K. Moraczewski, J. Richert, and M. Stepczynska, “Effect of corona treatment on wettability and surface free energy of polylactid composites,” Przemysi Chemiczny, 91, 599-603, (Apr 2012).
The paper investigates the effect of corona discharge (CD) treatment on the properties of surface layer (SL) of polylactide (PLA) film. The modification of PLAwas carried out in the air and helium atmosphere and the results were compared on the basis of the assessment ofwettability, surface free energy (SFE) calculated using Owens-Wendt method aswell as the degree of oxidation (O/C) of the modified SL, determined by photoelectron spectroscopy.
2433. Wolford, E.J., “Roundtable on surface treatment,” Flexible Packaging, 14, 34-35, (Apr 2012).
2440. Stecher, A., “Atmospheric plasma for critical decorating,” Plastics Decorating, 30-36, (Apr 2012).
2441. Sabreen, S.R., “Fluorooxidation: A breakthrough surface pretreatment,” Plastics Decorating, 14-16, (Apr 2012).
2523. Mix, R., J.F. Friedrich, and N. Inagaki, “Modification of branched polyethylene by aerosol-assisted dielectric barrier discharge,” Plasma Processes and Polymers, 9, 406-416, (Apr 2012).
Three polyethylene (PE) types with different branching structures were subjected to air, water and ethanol aerosol-assisted dielectric barrier discharges (DBD) for surface modification. Using the air DBD the incorporated oxygen concentration was found to be independent on the branching of PE in contrast to the introduction of OH groups, which was PE-2 > PE-1 > PE-3. For water-aerosol DBD the succession of OH concentration was in the order of PE-1 > PE-2 > PE-3. Ethanol aerosol-assisted DBD produced the lowest concentration of OH groups also independent on the branching of PE. The chemical nature of introduced oxygen functional groups was inspected by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and assigned as C
O, >C
O/CHO/O
C
O and O
C
O.
1641. Szymczyk, K., A. Zdziennicka, J. Krawczyk, and B. Janczuk, “Wettability, adhesion, adsorption and interface tension in the polymer/surfactant aqueous solution system I: Critical surface tension of polymer wetting and its surface tension,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 402, 132-138, (May 2012).
The contact angle of aqueous solutions of Triton X-100, Triton X-114, Triton X-165, sodium dodecylsulfate, sodium hexadecylsulfonate, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide, cetylpyridinium bromide, sodium N-lauryl sarcosinate, dodecyldimethyethylammonium bromide, tetradecyltrimethylammonium bromide and benzyldimethyldodecylammonium bromide on polytetrafluoroethylene, polymethyl methacrylate and nylon 6 was studied. The contact angle values were used in the Young equation for the polymer–solution interface tension calculation and for the determination of the critical surface tension of polymer wetting. The critical surface tension of polymer wetting was obtained on the basis of the relationship between the cosine of contact angle and/or the adhesion tension as a function of the surface tension of aqueous solution of studied surfactants and then was discussed in relation to the Lifshitz–van der Waals components and electron-acceptor and electron-donor parameters of polytetrafluoroethylene, polymethyl methacrylate and nylon 6 surface tension. The role of the parameter of interfacial interactions in the relationship between the critical surface tension of polymer wetting and the surface tension was also considered. This parameter was calculated by using the polymer–solution interface tension as well as the polymer and aqueous solutions of surfactant surface tension.
2437. Cohen E.D., “What is Mayer-rod coating and when should it be used?,” Converting Quarterly, 2, 15, (May 2012).
2438. Cohen, E.D., “Web coating defects: Role of substrate in defect formation,” Converting Quarterly, 2, 63-65, (May 2012).
2439. Wolf, R.A., “Testing surface treatment IQ,” Flexo, 37, 40-47, (May 2012).
2442. Mount, E.M. III, “Substrate secrets: Why are PP and PE not compatible?,” http://www.convertingquarterly.com/blogs/substrate-secrets/id/4266/, May 2012.
2447. Wolf, R.A., “Rx factor - automotive plastics and adhesion,” http://plasticsdecoratingblog.com/?p=296, May 2012.
2436. Mount, E.M. III, “Substrate secrets: Maintaining the surface energy of PET films,” http://www.convertingquarterly.com/blogs/substrate-secrets/id/4269/, Jun 2012.
2443. Mount, E.M. III, “Substrate secrets: Solubility parameters patent reference,” http://www.convertingquarterly.com/blogs/substrate-secrets/id/4357/, Jun 2012.
3116. Dowling, D.P., J. Tynan, P. Ward, A.M. Hynes, J. Cullen, and G. Byrne, “Atmospheric pressure plasma treatment of amorphous polyethylene terephthalate for enhanced heatsealing properties,” Intl. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, 35, 1-8, (Jun 2012).
An atmospheric pressure plasma system has been used to treat amorphous polyethylene terephthalate (APET) to enhance its heatseal properties to a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film. The plasma treated APET sheet material was thermoformed into trays for use in the food packaging industry and heatsealed to a PET film. The heatsealing properties of the resulting package were assessed using the burst test technique. It was found that the plasma treatment significantly enhanced the adhesive properties and an increase in burst pressure from 18 to 35 kPa was observed for plasma treated food trays. The APET surface chemistry was assessed after plasma treatment where it was found that the plasma treatment had affected an increase in oxygen and an addition of nitrogen species to the polymer surface. The surface roughness (Ra) of the plasma treated samples was also observed to increase from 0.4 to 0.9 nm after plasma treatment.
2445. Wolf, R.A., “Adhesion techniques for high performance materials and composites,” http://plasticsdecoratingblog.com/?p=317, Jul 2012.
2452. Sabreen, S.R., “Plastics surface energy wetting test methods,” Plastics Decorating, 23-24, (Jul 2012).
2472. Mount, E.M. III, “Substrate secrets: Metallized films - aluminum layer contamination in wound rolls,” http://www.convertingquarterly.com/blogs/substrate-secrets/id/4623/, Aug 2012.
2980. Kalapat, N., and T. Amornsakchai, “Surface modification of biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP) film using acrylic acid-corona treatment, Part I. Properties and characterization of treated films,” Surface and Coatings Technology, 207, 594-601, (Aug 2012).
In this work, the acrylic acid (AAc)-corona discharge was carried out on biaxially oriented polypropylene (BOPP) films by introducing AAc vapor into the corona region of a normal corona treater. Three different corona energies of 15.3, 38.2 and 76.4 kJ/m2 were studied. Surface properties of treated films were compared with those of air-corona treated films prepared with the same corona energies. The change in chemical composition on the film surface was characterized by curve-fitting of the ATR-FTIR spectra. The wettability of treated films, before and after aging in different environments, was observed by water contact angle and surface free energy. The surface morphology of air- and AAc-corona treated films was investigated using SEM and AFM techniques. Adhesion of the treated films to some other substrate was determined with the T-peeling test. It was found that the hydrophilicity of all treated films increased with increasing corona energy. AAc-corona treated films showed greater wettability than did the air-corona treated films and could retain the surface hydrophilicity for more than 90 days of aging under ambient conditions. The surface morphology of BOPP films changed after corona treatment into a globular structure. The AAc-corona treated films showed rougher surfaces due to surface oxidation and polymer formation, whereas, air-corona treated films displayed a similar structure but of smaller size due to the formation of low molecular weight oxidized materials (LMWOM) arising from the degradation of BOPP films. AAc-corona treated films showed greater peel strength than did the air-corona treated films.
2453. Bishop, C.A., “Surface energy and adhesion for metallization,” http://www.convertingquarterly.com/blogs/vacuum-web-coating/id/4749/, Sep 2012.
3078. Vlaeva, I.,, T. Yovcheva, A. Viraneva, S. Kitova, G. Exner, A. Guzhova, and M. Galikhanov, “Contact angle analysis of corona treated polypropylene films,” J. Physics: Conference Series, 398, 012054, (Sep 2012).
In this work, the effect of the surface modification of polypropylene films via corona treatment was investigated. Polypropylene films were treated with negative and positive corona discharge, at atmospheric pressure, for 5 minutes, at two different temperatures – 25 °C and 90 °C. The changes in the surface free energy were investigated by means of contact angle measurements. The Bickerman's method was applied to determine the polar and dispersion components of the polymer surface free energy, on the basis of the theory of Owens, Wendt, Kaelble and Uy. Atomic force microscopy was used to analyze the polymer surface morphology changes of the films with temperature. According to the findings, in all cases the corona treatment increases the surface free energy of polypropylene films and its polar part, in comparison with the untreated samples. The effects of negative and positive corona polarities display some specific features which could be associated with different charged group introduced onto the film surface during the corona treatment. The total final effect depends on the simultaneous action of the two competing factors – temperature and corona polarity. The most pronounced effect was observed for high temperature negative corona treatment.
2461. Sabreen, S.R., “Q & A: Process solutions for adhesion bonding of nylon,” http://www.plasticsdecorating.com/ENEWS/ENews.asp?item=101812qa-sabreen, Oct 2012.
2462. Wolf, R.A., “Graphics adhesion advice for IML & shrink-sleeve films,” Converting Quarterly, 2, 48-51, (Oct 2012).
<-- Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | Next-->