ACCU DYNE TEST ™ Bibliography
Provided as an information service by Diversified Enterprises.
showing result page 76 of 77, ordered by
2851. no author cited, “Corona vs. plasma: A comparison between surface treatments,” Ferrarini & Benelli,
2853. no author cited, “Plasma treatment at atmospheric pressure conditions,” Ferrarini & Benelli,
2854. no author cited, “Destructioning the ozone produced by the corona treatment,” Ferrarini & Benelli,
2855. no author cited, “Pretreatment methods for glass,” https://www.inkcups.com/blog/pretreatment-methods-for-glass/, July 2019.
2856. no author cited, “Dynamic surface tension and surface energy in ink formulations and substrates,” https://www.pcimag.com/articles/85879-dynamic-surface-tension-and-surface-energy-in-ink-formulations-and-substrates, May 2001.
2857. no author cited, “Surface treatment and adhesion of APTIV [PEEK] film,” Victrex,
2859. no author cited, “Wetting and contact angle (TeachEngineering STEM Curriculum for K-12),” https://www.teachengineering.org/lessons/view/duk__surface tensionunit_less3,
2873. no author cited, “Q&A - Vetaphone: Know your films!,” PFFC, 26, 30-33, (Oct 2021).
2875. no author cited, “Buddy, can you spare a dyne?,” Enercon Industries, Nov 2021.
2907. no author cited, “Contact angle: A guide to theory and measurement,” Ossila,
2911. no author cited, “How are probe liquids selected for surface energy measurements?,” https://www.physics.stackexchange.com/questions/243750/how-are-probe-liquids-selected,
2925. no author cited, “Common surface energy tests: Dyne inks,” Brighton Science, Sep 2016.
2926. no author cited, “What is the best fast & accurate alternative to dyne testing?,” Brighton Science, Aug 2019.
2927. no author cited, “How to control additive blooming in polymer films,” Brighton Science, Jun 2020.
2937. no author cited, “Standard T565: Contact angle of water droplets on corona-treated polymer film surfaces,” TAPPI, 1996.
2938. no author cited, “ASTM D724: Standard test method for surface wettability of paper (angle-of-contact method),” ASTM, 1994.
2939. no author cited, “Determination of the surface tension between a printing ink and fountain water during the offset process (Application note 3),” https://www.dataphysics-instruments.com/Downloads/3,
2940. no author cited, “Optimisation of the determination of surface free energies of polymers (Application note 4),” https://www.dataphysics-instruments.com/Downloads/4,
2941. no author cited, “Simplified determination of the surface free energy of polymers (Application note 6),” https://www.dataphysics-instruments.com/Downloads/6,
2942. no author cited, “Determination of contact angles by different methods of dropshape analysis (Application note 12),” https://www.dataphysics-instruments.com/Downloads/12,
2943. no author cited, “Calculation of a new reference liquid by measurement on a known solid surface (Application note 17),” https://www.dataphysics-instruments.com/Downloads/17,
2944. no author cited, “Dynamic contact angle measurements on curved surfaces by using the bridge-function (Application note 22),” https://www.dataphysics-instruments.com/Downloads/22,
3002. no author cited, “Single vs. multi-fluid contact angle techniques part 1: Surface energy and the attractions between substances,” Brighton Science, May 2020.
3003. no author cited, “Single vs. multi-fluid contact angle techniques part 2: Why one fluid is all you need for process control in manufacturing,” Brighton Science, May 2020.
3004. no author cited, “What is the difference between surface free energy and surface energy?,” Brighton Science, Mar 2021.
3005. no author cited, “What is the difference between surface tension and surface energy,” Brighton Science, Mar 2021.
3006. no author cited, “Why a surface chemistry input should be included in new product specifications,” Brighton Science, Nov 2022.
3007. no author cited, “Demystifying dyne levels: A comprehensive guide,” Brighton Science, Aug 2023.
3008. no author cited, “The water break test as a surface measurement gauge,” Brighton Sciencce, Oct 2023.
3019. no author cited, “Why test inks cannot tell the full truth about surface free energy,” Kruss Application Report AR272, Jun 2014.
3023. no author cited, “What is dyne testing?,” Brighton Science, Oct 2023.
2206. no author cited:, “Surface treatment trouble shooting: What is the formula to calculate watt density?,” http://www.pillartech.eu/Treaters/trtr8.htm,
654. van Damme, H.S., A.H. Hogt, and J. Feijen, “Surface mobility and structural transitions of poly(n-alkyl methacrylates) probed by dynamic contact angle measurement,” in Polymer Surface Dynamics, Andrade, J.D., ed., 89-110, Plenum Press, 1988.
371. van Ness, K.E., “Surface tension and surface entropy for polymer liquids,” Polymer Engineering and Science, 32, 122-129, (Jan 1992).
A cell theory for the prediction of the surface tension of polymer liquids is modified to include an entropic effect due to molecular asymmetry. Also considered is the extent of the effect of the preservation of connectivity in the vicinity of the surface upon the potential energy zero term due to missing nearest neighbors of orders greater than one. Theory and experiment are in good agreement without an adjustable surface parameter.
798. van Ooij, W.J., S. Luo, E. Mader, and K. Mai, “Improved rubber adhesion to textile tire cords by deposition of plasma-polymerized films,” in Polymer Surface Modification: Relevance to Adhesion, Vol. 2, K.L. Mittal, ed., 225-242, VSP, Dec 2000.
Aramid cords and fibers and polyester tire cords were treated in a continuous or pulsed DC plasma containing organic monomers such as pyrrole or acetylene in a custom-built reactor. For the treated cords the rubber adhesion was measured in a standard pull-out test. It was found that the plasma polymer coating significantly increased the pull-out forces. The effect of the power-to-pressure ratio and the pulsing of DC power on the performance of the treated cords or fibers were investigated. It was found that, in general, low power / high pressure conditions gave better results than high power / low pressure conditions. Coatings obtained under these conditions were thoroughly characterized by a range of analytical tools. Based on these data and on failure analysis, models were developed to explain the experimental findings.
662. van Ooij, W.J., and H.R. Anderson Jr., eds., First International Congress on Adhesion Science and Technology: Festschrift in Honor of Dr. K.L. Mittal on the Occasion of his 50th Birthday, VSP, 1998.
586. van Ooij, W.J., et al, “Plasma-polymerized organic coatings deposited on metals from a DC plasma; characterization and applications of such surface modifications,” in ANTEC 95, Society of Plastics Engineers, Apr 1995.
655. van Oss, C.J., “Acid-base effects at polymer interfaces,” in Polymer Surfaces and Interfaces II, Feast, W.J., H.S. Munro, and R.W. Richards, eds., 267-286, John Wiley & Sons, Apr 1993.
781. van Oss, C.J., “Acid-base interactions as the driving force for both hydrophobic attraction and hydrophilic repulsion,” in Acid-Base Interactions: Relevance to Adhesion Science and Technology, Vol. 2, K.L. Mittal, ed., 173-180, VSP, Dec 2000.
<-- Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | Next-->